I would [have to agree with you there, bad] and I think the different spin at the tire to GPS [gear you are in] could effect that 11:1 to 10:1. The bad news is to un-loop the GPS, but that will lag you on the a-N side. That is why the hack or to cutout the gear input will slow you down on the top end. You got TRE'd on the other side of the 1320/1000 footear...
I have no clue but to assume the gear ratio changed the crank spin and that might be the fuel/ratio change was feeding that input to the GPS [a different gear to set the crank spinning at a different speed is like the middleman trim].
Now, what happens with the GPS out of the loop and in code(s)<Pick? There is where I would re-ride a 10/20 minute window and see what fuel trim changed if any through the GPS [out of the loop(s)< Remember there are two]. Now, I'd be working that second map and toggle to the trim that way. Because, it sure looks rpm to rear wheel related being the speed sensor knows if the back wheel is spinning as if no road existed between crank and rear wheel ratios. Without reading the blueprints inside the ECU/Spark Box, it could even be the speed sensor too.
Clutch wise: If you tried the washers behind the OEM clutch springs; if you used heavy duty aftermarket springs; if both of those do not keep the wheel from slipping plates, then that lockup is one more power transfer unit to the ground it take$ = I'm not telling you anything new.
Sorry, I could not answer you there, 1bad. All I can do is send you out to R&D the speed/gps to see if those two are the cause and effect or it is just the crank to TPS (throttle position sensor) and the code play in the redundant. Shit!
Tormenting the motorcycling community one post at a time