I'm glad you're happy with your dyno results. They don't mean anything, but I'm glad you're happy.
I've got a little question for the "numbers" guys here. First of all let me make it VERY clear that I'm not referencing drag racing because I've never done that. So with that said don't get my question distorted into a reference to drag racing ok?
It's complicated because while we're on a forum and for the most part only know each other as forum members, we all have a relationship and history here. Maverick has been shoving his amateur hotshit drag credentials in my face for a while now. He didn't explicitly speak of drag racing here, his amateur hotshit drag racing hobby is the authority he's speaking from.
First of all can we agree that "true performance" comes from the combination of bike AND rider, since the bike, no matter the HP, torque, top speed, etc... is of no importance at all without a rider? I mean, they don't drive themselves right? So considering that the combination of HP, torque, speed and yes, "ASS" is required before ANYTHING matters lets delve right into it.
Right on.
Ok, "Numbers", if I'm reading all these posts correctly, and correct me if I'm wrong, you're saying that if your ass is saying that your bike is performing better that the "package" is actually not performing better?
No.
Again, I don't know about drag racing, but I'm willing to wager that if you're alive enough to participate in this forum you haven't been around, ridden or raced bikes much longer than I have...if AT ALL. I'm NOT saying you don't have more accomplished skills or expertise than myself, I'm talking overall experience and general knowledge. So I'm not challenging anything like that, so don't take it personal. It's not meant that way at all. So, here's the nut cuttin on this.
I lump people into two groups, amateurs and professionals. You're either one or the other. We're both amateurs. We both pay to ride, we are not paid to ride. As far as my riding skills... LOL let me put it this way I'm sure the local club racers have no fear of me.
Man/ass thinks bike performs better? Package performs better...period. Whether it's in the form of mental (confidence) or ass (feel). A rider THINKS he's riding faster, he usually is. I've also seen it where the "Numbers" said he should be faster and he wasn't. Usually it was because he didn't THINK it felt any different. There's also the combination of the "Numbers" AND the "Ass" agreeing and he's faster. You'll notice the common denominator is "THINKS".
This has been proven incorrect time and time again. I don't intend any offense, consider this an opportunity for learning. The mindset you have here is that of the most elementary level. Look at what the pros do, they make minute changes and test them, record the befores and afters.
Do you use torque wrenches working on your bike? (I hope the answer is yes). Studies have been found that people who believe they can hand tighten to specification were found to be extremely innaccurate, most commonly vastly under tightening a fastener. But in their minds, they can do it. Which one are you? Do you think you can tighten a faster acurately by hand? Or do you use a torque wrench? I use torque wrenches.
So without going too much further with this, I'm going to say that arguing over what works is just, well...you know. Thanks
I'm glad your happy. That's great. However here's the thing. You're saying my bike makes good dyno numbers. And it does, and that's great. But is that all you're saying? Are you saying your bike is faster? Ok, if you are, you might be surprised that even though you "feel" your bike pulls harder or whatever it's in your head.
There's no feelings about numbers. If you had acceleration numbers of before the flash, and after the flash, then you would KNOW whether or not the bike is actually faster. Dyno increases do not necessarily convert into decreased acceleration times.
This is why it's important to actually do some kind of validation testing. You cannot rely on your ass to tell you the bike is faster.
I have 2 ECUs. The one that came with the bike which remains stock, and a 2nd ECU I bought and had flashed (same part numbers). When I put the flash in I felt things and heard things I hadn't noticed before... one time the bike power wheelied in 2nd gear. Going down the highway, I now heard sort of a twiddling sound. I thought, gee that must be the unified mappings why it sounds different. I was told it sounded different, there I heard it sounding different.
Put stock ECU back in. Huh...well this is strange. It just power wheelied unexpectedly in 2nd gear? Hey wait a second, that twiddling sound is still there.
So here's the thing. Without the ability to put back in a completely stock ECU I would've been one of the people up here posting abhout how great the flash is and now my bike power wheelies in 2nd and makes a different sound driving down the highway. See what I'm saying here?
Cause I actually did post that. However I put the stock ECU back in and experienced the same things I posted that too. Sorry, 0/2 for flashed ECU.
* Last updated by: VicThing on 9/12/2015 @ 9:07 AM *